Ruin
Digitally printed
72 pages, hand sewn with exposed spine
9.125 by 13.125 inches
2026
Edition of 30
Project statement
72 pages, hand sewn with exposed spine
9.125 by 13.125 inches
2026
Edition of 30
Project statement
Visit Maine
Digitally printed
7 postcards and a wrapper
6 by 4 inches
2026
A set of seven postcards documenting the widely ignored and poorly understood windowless vernacular architecture of Mid-Coast Maine. This set documents examples of Neodefenestrationism, Defenestration Revivalism, and Reformed Domestic Defenestrationism, as well as the most radical version, Antistomatonism.
7 postcards and a wrapper
6 by 4 inches
2026
A set of seven postcards documenting the widely ignored and poorly understood windowless vernacular architecture of Mid-Coast Maine. This set documents examples of Neodefenestrationism, Defenestration Revivalism, and Reformed Domestic Defenestrationism, as well as the most radical version, Antistomatonism.
Circus of the Spectacle
Digitally printed with a digitally printed hard cover
40 removable pages in a menu-style binding
9.5 by 12 inches
2026
Edition of 30
Project statement
40 removable pages in a menu-style binding
9.5 by 12 inches
2026
Edition of 30
Project statement
Plessy v. Ferguson
Digitally printed broadside
19 by 27 inches
2025
Plessy V. Ferguson was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision ruling that racial segregation laws did not violate the U.S. Constitution as long as the facilities for each race were equal in quality, a doctrine that came to be known as “separate but equal.” The decision legitimized the many state “Jim Crow laws” re-establishing the racial segregation that had re-emerged in the American South after the end of the Reconstruction era in 1877.
Such legally enforced segregation in the South lasted into the 1960s.
19 by 27 inches
2025
Plessy V. Ferguson was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision ruling that racial segregation laws did not violate the U.S. Constitution as long as the facilities for each race were equal in quality, a doctrine that came to be known as “separate but equal.” The decision legitimized the many state “Jim Crow laws” re-establishing the racial segregation that had re-emerged in the American South after the end of the Reconstruction era in 1877.
Such legally enforced segregation in the South lasted into the 1960s.
Korematsu v. USA
Digitally printed broadside
19 by 27 inches
2025
Korematsu V. United States of America was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that upheld the internment of Japanese-Americans from the West Coast Military Area into concentration camps during World War II. Fred Korematsu was convicted for violating the military order that mandated his internment. This Supreme Court case upheld his conviction, and thus allowed the forcible relocation of American citizens to concentration camps solely on the basis of race.
Korematsu’s conviction was voided in 1983 on the grounds that Solicitor General Charles H. Fahy had suppressed a report from the Office of Naval Intelligence which stated there was no evidence that Japanese-Americans were acting as spies for Japan. The Japanese-Americans who were interned were later granted reparations through the Civil Liberties Act of 1988.
19 by 27 inches
2025
Korematsu V. United States of America was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that upheld the internment of Japanese-Americans from the West Coast Military Area into concentration camps during World War II. Fred Korematsu was convicted for violating the military order that mandated his internment. This Supreme Court case upheld his conviction, and thus allowed the forcible relocation of American citizens to concentration camps solely on the basis of race.
Korematsu’s conviction was voided in 1983 on the grounds that Solicitor General Charles H. Fahy had suppressed a report from the Office of Naval Intelligence which stated there was no evidence that Japanese-Americans were acting as spies for Japan. The Japanese-Americans who were interned were later granted reparations through the Civil Liberties Act of 1988.
